Consider entering in the Short Short Fiction Contest for Glimmer Train Stories. Entry is in July
I have great news. I completed the SECOND VERSION of Psychopathic Koan yesterday (a la Barry Spacks edits: (1) promising structure and topic (2) tree metaphor confusing (3) not enough contrast of characters in dialogue, a bit too dominant with one character, a bit of a male-female thing going (5) the different possibilities not clearly pointed out, which can transform the writing appearance again (4) unsatisfying, unresolving ending.The story is ultimately kicking off with a koan, then followed up by a conversation between two people who are novelly involved in a relationship. The girl is interested in better understanding the koan, while the guy is satisfied with his initial interpretation. They both start to analyze the koan as a story with multiple endings, and search for the multiple endings. At first there was literal interpretation, then gone to figurative, metaphorical interpretation over time, and in the end, it is ultimately how each character relates to the koan, and how their individaul relationship to the koan leads to an "unwritten promise" as to how to conduct their relationship, never to serve the role of the man who drops the jug of water on the road.So I told Jules last night that the story I wrote no longer really reflected out conversations, nor our personalities anymore.Here's Barry's response.The structure of the piece is wonderfully fresh, the tree metaphor-within-a-metaphor—tree of options confusing, the distinction between the two interlocutors as to the working out of possibilities in the koan-story not sharply drawn (he agrees most of the time with her riffs of interpretation but the drama of the structure requests more marked differences to fuel the vigor of the exchange). The ending is too vague, drifty, its implications unclear, and the wording of the koan itself at the start not cleanly formed enough to project koanic-style and feeling.I find a need for greater logical necessity in the inclusion of each of the variations (are they all illustrative of possible turns of thought and consequence? -- if not, the dialogue, though energetic and entertaining, goes on too long and would be happier stylistically (give the terseness of koanic discourse) if there were a tighter feeling of inductive sequence to the various sub-possibilities.In short: the form is the strongest feature, namely koan with following contemporary discussion -- this is fresh and engaging.A work in progress. Beckett would continue to serve well as a stylistic model. Maybe do some reading in a collection of koans?promising work!
Here's the link to THE NEW VERSION OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC KOAN:Maybe next time I could deal with how to visually portray the different alternatives, as well as a sideview picture of the man, his pathos, and his logos.http://stokastika2.googlepages.com/thepsychopathickoan3.pdf.
http://stokastika2.googlepages.com/thepsychopathickoan3.pdf
Post a Comment
Enter your email address:
Delivered by FeedBurner
4 comments:
Consider entering in the Short Short Fiction Contest for Glimmer Train Stories. Entry is in July
I have great news. I completed the SECOND VERSION of Psychopathic Koan yesterday (a la Barry Spacks edits: (1) promising structure and topic (2) tree metaphor confusing (3) not enough contrast of characters in dialogue, a bit too dominant with one character, a bit of a male-female thing going (5) the different possibilities not clearly pointed out, which can transform the writing appearance again (4) unsatisfying, unresolving ending.
The story is ultimately kicking off with a koan, then followed up by a conversation between two people who are novelly involved in a relationship. The girl is interested in better understanding the koan, while the guy is satisfied with his initial interpretation. They both start to analyze the koan as a story with multiple endings, and search for the multiple endings. At first there was literal interpretation, then gone to figurative, metaphorical interpretation over time, and in the end, it is ultimately how each character relates to the koan, and how their individaul relationship to the koan leads to an "unwritten promise" as to how to conduct their relationship, never to serve the role of the man who drops the jug of water on the road.
So I told Jules last night that the story I wrote no longer really reflected out conversations, nor our personalities anymore.
Here's Barry's response.
The structure of the piece is wonderfully fresh, the tree metaphor-within-a-metaphor—tree of options confusing, the distinction between the two interlocutors as to the working out of possibilities in the koan-story not sharply drawn (he agrees most of the time with her riffs of interpretation but the drama of the structure requests more marked differences to fuel the vigor of the exchange). The ending is too vague, drifty, its implications unclear, and the wording of the koan itself at the start not cleanly formed enough to project koanic-style and feeling.
I find a need for greater logical necessity in the inclusion of each of the variations (are they all illustrative of possible turns of thought and consequence? -- if not, the dialogue, though energetic and entertaining, goes on too long and would be happier stylistically (give the terseness of koanic discourse) if there were a tighter feeling of inductive sequence to the various sub-possibilities.
In short: the form is the strongest feature, namely koan with following contemporary discussion -- this is fresh and engaging.
A work in progress. Beckett would continue to serve well as a stylistic model. Maybe do some reading in a collection of koans?
promising work!
Here's the link to THE NEW VERSION OF THE PSYCHOPATHIC KOAN:
Maybe next time I could deal with how to visually portray the different alternatives, as well as a sideview picture of the man, his pathos, and his logos.
http://stokastika2.googlepages.com/thepsychopathickoan3.pdf.
http://stokastika2.googlepages.com/
thepsychopathickoan3.pdf
Post a Comment